United Kingdom
Argentina 
Australia 
Austria 
Brazil 
Canada 
Germany 
Ireland 
Italy 
Malaysia 
Mexico 
New Zealand 
Poland 
South Africa 
United States The Buffy the Vampire Slayer reboot is a bad idea – that TV sorely ...
Sign up to our free IndyArts newsletter for all the latest entertainment news and reviews
Sign up to our free IndyArts newsletter
Sign up to our free IndyArts newsletter
Remember when Buffy the Vampire Slayer died? It was back in May 2001 that Sarah Michelle Gellar’s teenage demon-slayer sacrificed her life in Buffy’s fifth season finale. By October, she was back – her grief-stricken friends having, through magic incantation, wrenched her from heaven and back down to the sterile promontory of life. In Buffy, death is often far from permanent.
There’s some fittingness, then, in the reports that Buffy is itself being revived – not by witchcraft, but by Hulu. The series has, until now, been enjoying a pretty unique afterlife. Creatively, its reputation has only grown – the show’s innovations in form, structure and tone have altered both the medium of television, and pop culture at large. But its legacy has been complicated by unhappy tales of its making: grim allegations of on-set wrongdoing levied against creator Joss Whedon.
A revival series would have to navigate a hell of a lot of baggage, on top of a creative landscape that has been radically overhauled by the age of streaming. It is, in other words, almost doomed to disappoint. Despite this, though, it’s hard not to be excited: television is crying out for another show like Buffy.
Gellar’s involvement in the new series will be crucial: it was her significant star power upon which the success of the original hinged. If nothing else, Buffy’s return gives her a chance at a long-overdue career renaissance. But just as important is who’s in charge of the new series: sisters Nora and Lilla Zuckerman. The Zuckermans worked under Whedon on his now-mostly-forgotten Marvel series Agents of SHIELD, and – more significantly – served as showrunners for the Columbo-inspired Natasha Lyonne detective series Poker Face (set to return for season two later this year).
What made Poker Face such a breath of fresh air, televisually speaking, was its fidelity to an older, near-extinct mode of TV – one comprising episodic stories. Buffy was almost peerless in its use of this semi-serialised “monster of the week” format; the ability to tell these largely self-contained stories allowed it the freedom to take risks, and to embrace high-concept storytelling. Many of the series’ most popular episodes – such as season four’s “Hush”, told without spoken dialogue, or season six’s musical episode “Once More, with Feeling” – were only possible because of the show’s storytelling structure.
All the while, Buffy was also elegant in its crafting of bigger, season-long arcs; its fusion of these two elements was both groundbreaking and extremely difficult to pull off. Recent shows attempting to mimic Buffy’s appeal, such as the Netflix-produced Sabrina the Teenage Witch, have tripped up on this basic structural level – prioritising the sort of tiresome “10-hour-film” serialisation that’s de rigueur in the streaming era.
When it comes to baggage, it’s not just Whedon who’s the problem – though the disgraced writer’s spectre will inevitably hang over whatever the new Buffy becomes. Nicholas Brendon, who played Xander for the entirety of the show, has faced a slew of legal issues in the years since the series ended, including convictions for domestic violence. He is surely not going to return, but the optics of leaving him out could create issues when it comes to bringing back other cast members – most significantly Alyson Hannigan’s Willow (the third member of the core friend-group triad).
That’s not to say they won’t bring him back, of course, but it would just mean more questions on the press tour; more gossip on social media; another point of controversy that must be stepped around or addressed.
Of course, Buffy has already survived one reboot – more than survived, in fact. In its original incarnation – a 1992 theatrical movie scripted by Whedon – Buffy the Vampire Slayer was pretty terrible: broad, obnoxious, above all not funny. Other than keeping a few wispy strands of narrative continuity, the TV series started from scratch, opting for an entirely different tone and reshaping Buffy into a far more interesting lead. A new revival will face a more delicate task – updating its predecessor without changing what worked.
Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 days
New subscribers only. £8.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled
Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 days
New subscribers only. £8.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled
Fans seem to be cautiously optimistic about Buffy’s return – or, at the very least, interested. (It’s a vastly different reaction from, say, the one to greet the recent Frasier revival, which was accurately written off as doomed from the moment of conception.) It may be nostalgia that makes the idea seem appealing – not just nostalgia for the specific world of Buffy, but nostalgia for an entire way of making television, an artform that has, in the intervening years, mutated beyond recognition. And hey – sometimes raising the dead works out OK. Just don’t put away the stakes just yet.
