Uncertain storage prospects create a conundrum for carbon capture and storage ambitions
Rogelj, J., McCollum, D. L., Reisinger, A., Meinshausen, M. & Riahi, K. Probabilistic cost estimates for climate change mitigation. Nature 493, 79–83 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Davidson, C. L. et al. The value of CCS under current policy scenarios: NDCs and beyond. Energy Proc. 114, 7521–7527 (2017).
Vinca, A., Rottoli, M., Marangoni, G. & Tavoni, M. The role of carbon capture and storage electricity in attaining 1.5 and 2 °C. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 78, 148–159 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
Exploring Clean Energy Pathways: The Role of CO2Storage (IEA, 2019).
Luderer, G. et al. Residual fossil CO2 emissions in 1.5–2 °C pathways. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 626–633 (2018).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Gambhir, A., Rogelj, J., Luderer, G., Few, S. & Napp, T. Energy system changes in 1.5 °C, well below 2 °C and 2 °C scenarios. Energy Strateg. Rev. 23, 69–80 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
Kriegler, E. et al. Short term policies to keep the door open for Paris climate goals. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 074022 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Minx, J. C. et al. Negative emissions—part 1: research landscape and synthesis. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 063001 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
Hilaire, J. et al. Negative emissions and international climate goals—learning from and about mitigation scenarios. Clim. Change https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02516-4 (2019).
Liu, P. R. & Raftery, A. E. Country-based rate of emissions reductions should increase by 80% beyond nationally determined contributions to meet the 2 °C target. Commun. Earth Environ. 2, 29 (2021).
Article Google Scholar
Larkin, A., Kuriakose, J., Sharmina, M. & Anderson, K. What if negative emission technologies fail at scale? Implications of the Paris Agreement for big emitting nations. Clim. Policy 18, 690–714 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
Marcucci, A., Panos, E., Kypreos, S. & Fragkos, P. Probabilistic assessment of realizing the 1.5 °C climate target. Appl. Energy 239, 239–251 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
Holz, C., Siegel, L. S., Johnston, E., Jones, A. P. & Sterman, J. Ratcheting ambition to limit warming to 1.5 °C-trade-offs between emission reductions and carbon dioxide removal. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 064028 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Benveniste, H., Boucher, O., Guivarch, C., Le Treut, H. & Criqui, P. Impacts of nationally determined contributions on 2030 global greenhouse gas emissions: uncertainty analysis and distribution of emissions. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 014022 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Reiner, D. M. Learning through a portfolio of carbon capture and storage demonstration projects. Nat. Energy 1, 15011 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
Langhelle, O. & Meadowcroft, J. in Caching the Carbon: The Politics and Policy of Carbon Capture and Storage (eds Meadowcroft, J. & Langhelle, O.) 236–266 (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2009).
Lipponen, J. et al. The politics of large-scale CCS deployment. In Proc. 13th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (eds Dixon, T. et al.) Vol. 114, 7581–7595 (Elsevier Science, 2017).
Andreas, J.-J., Serdoner, A. & Whiriskey, K. An Industry’s Guide to Climate Action (The Bellona Foundation, 2018); https://network.bellona.org/content/uploads/sites/3/2018/11/Industry-Report-final.pdf
Negative Emissions Technologies and Reliable Sequestration: A Research Agenda (The National Academies Press, 2019).
Lomax, G., Lenton, T. M., Adeosun, A. & Workman, M. Investing in negative emissions. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 498–500 (2015).
Article Google Scholar
van Vuuren, D. P., Hof, A. F., van Sluisveld, M. A. E. & Riahi, K. Open discussion of negative emissions is urgently needed. Nat. Energy 2, 902–904 (2017).
Article Google Scholar
Realmonte, G. et al. An inter-model assessment of the role of direct air capture in deep mitigation pathways. Nat. Commun. 10, 3277 (2019).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Vaughan, N. E. et al. Evaluating the use of biomass energy with carbon capture and storage in low emission scenarios. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 044014 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Arranz, A. M. Hype among low-carbon technologies: carbon capture and storage in comparison. Glob. Environ. Change 41, 124–141 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
World Energy Investment 2018 (IEA, 2018); https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264301351-en
Haszeldine, R. S., Flude, S., Johnson, G. & Scott, V. Negative emissions technologies and carbon capture and storage to achieve the Paris Agreement commitments. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20160447 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Energy Technology Perspectives 2017 (IEA, 2017); https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-technology-perspectives-2017
Viebahn, P. & Chappin, E. J. L. Scrutinising the gap between the expected and actual deployment of carbon capture and storage—a bibliometric analysis. Energies 11, 2319 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
Li, J., Hou, Y., Wang, P. & Yang, B. A review of carbon capture and storage project investment and operational decision-making based on bibliometrics. Energies 12, 23 (2019).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Romasheva, N. & Ilinova, A. CCS projects: how regulatory framework influences their deployment. Resources 8, 181 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
Li, H., Jiang, H.-D., Yang, B. & Liao, H. An analysis of research hotspots and modeling techniques on carbon capture and storage. Sci. Total Environ. 687, 687–701 (2019).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Qiu, H.-H. & Liu, L.-G. A study on the evolution of carbon capture and storage technology based on knowledge mapping. Energies 11, 1103 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
Stephens, J. C. Time to stop investing in carbon capture and storage and reduce government subsidies of fossil-fuels. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 5, 169–173 (2014).
Article Google Scholar
Corry, O. & Riesch, H. in The Social Dynamics of Carbon Capture and Storage: Understanding CCS Representations, Governance and Innovation (eds Markusson, N. et al.) 91–108 (Routledge, 2012).
Ulterino, M. CCS: sitting on the wrong side of innovation. Energy Environ. 23, 419–424 (2012).
Article Google Scholar
Dooley, J. J. Valuing national and basin level geologic CO2 storage capacity assessments in a broader context. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 5, 177–178 (2011).
Article Google Scholar
Consoli, C. P. & Wildgust, N. Current status of global storage resources. In Proc. 13th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (eds Dixon, T. et al.) Vol. 114, 4623–4628 (Elsevier Science, 2017).
Technology Roadmap: Carbon Capture and Storage (IEA, 2009).
Prospects for Carbon Capture and Storage in Southeast Asia (ADB, 2013).
Goodman, A. et al. Comparison of methods for geologic storage of carbon dioxide in saline formations. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 18, 329–342 (2013).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Viebahn, P., Vallentin, D. & Hoeller, S. Prospects of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in India’s power sector—an integrated assessment. Appl. Energy 117, 62–75 (2014).
Article Google Scholar
Benson, S. M. et al. in Global Energy Assessment—Toward a Sustainable Future (ed. GEA Writing Team) 993–1068 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012).
IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005).
Fuss, S. et al. Negative emissions—part 2: costs, potentials and side effects. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 063002 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Bachu, S. Review of CO2 storage efficiency in deep saline aquifers. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 40, 188–202 (2015).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Pickup, G. E. in Geological Storage of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) (eds Gluyas, J. & Mathias, S.) 26–44 (Woodhead Publishing, 2013).
Dooley, J. J. Estimating the supply and demand for deep geologic CO2 storage capacity over the course of the 21st century: a meta-analysis of the literature. Energy Proc. 37, 5141–5150 (2013).
Kearns, J. et al. Developing a consistent database for regional geologic CO2 storage capacity worldwide. Energy Proc. 114, 4697–4709 (2017).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Haszeldine, R. S. Carbon capture and storage: how green can black be? Science 325, 1647–1652 (2009).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Allinson, W. G., Cinar, Y., Neal, P. R., Kaldi, J. & Paterson, L. CO2 storage capacity—combining geology, engineering and economics. In Proc. SPE Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition Paper Number SPE-133804-PA (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2014); https://doi.org/10.2118/133804-PA
Garnett, A. J., Greig, C. R. & Oettinger, M. ZeroGen IGCC with CCS—A Case History (Univ. Queensland, 2014).
Thibeau, S. & Mucha, V. Have we overestimated saline aquifer CO2 storage capacities? Oil Gas Sci. Technol. 66, 81–92 (2011).
CAS Article Google Scholar
The Global Status of CCS 2020 (GCCSI, 2020).
UK Among World Leaders in Global Energy Revolution (Drax Group, 2018); https://www.drax.com/press_release/uk-among-world-leaders-global-energy-revolution/
Asayama, S. & Ishii, A. Selling stories of techno-optimism? The role of narratives on discursive construction of carbon capture and storage in the Japanese media. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 31, 50–59 (2017).
Article Google Scholar
de Pee, A. et al. Decarbonization of Industrial Sectors: The Next Frontier (McKinsey & Company, 2018).
Roadmap for Carbon Capture and Storage Demonstration and Deployment in the People’s Republic of China (ADB, 2015).
Corless, V. et al. Insuring Energy Independence—A CCS Roadmap for Poland (The Bellona Foundation, 2011); https://bellona.org/publication/insuring-energy-independance-a-ccs-roadmap-for-poland
Schrag, D. P. Preparing to capture carbon. Science 315, 812–813 (2007).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Staffell, I., Jansen, M., Chase, A., Cotton, E. & Lewis, C. Energy Revolution: A Global Outlook (Drax Group, 2018); https://www.drax.com/energy-policy/energy-revolution-global-outlook/
Consoli, C. CCS Storage Indicator (CCS-SI) (GCCSI, 2018); https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/resources/publications-reports-research/ccs-storage-indicator-ccs-si/
Tavoni, M. & Socolow, R. Modeling meets science and technology: an introduction to a special issue on negative emissions. Clim. Change 118, 1–14 (2013).
Article Google Scholar
Koelbl, B. S., van den Broek, M. A., Faaij, A. P. C. & van Vuuren, D. P. Uncertainty in carbon capture and storage (CCS) deployment projections: a cross-model comparison exercise. Clim. Change 123, 461–476 (2014).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Mac Dowell, N., Fennell, P. S., Shah, N. & Maitland, G. C. The role of CO2 capture and utilization in mitigating climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 243–249 (2017).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Wei, N. et al. A preliminary sub-basin scale evaluation framework of site suitability for onshore aquifer-based CO2 storage in China. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 12, 231–246 (2013).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Grataloup, S. et al. A site selection methodology for CO2 underground storage in deep saline aquifers: case of the Paris Basin. Energy Proc. 1, 2929–2936 (2009).
Chadwick, R. A., Noy, D. J. & Holloway, S. Flow processes and pressure evolution in aquifers during the injection of supercritical CO2 as a greenhouse gas mitigation measure. Petrol. Geosci. 15, 59–73 (2009).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Teletzke, G. F. et al. Evaluation of practicable subsurface CO2 storage capacity and potential CO2 transportation networks, onshore North America. In Proc. 14th Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Conference (IEAGHG, 2018); https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3366176
Aminu, M. D., Nabavi, S. A., Rochelle, C. A. & Manovic, V. A review of developments in carbon dioxide storage. Appl. Energy 208, 1389–1419 (2017).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Agada, S. et al. Sensitivity analysis of the dynamic CO2 storage capacity estimate for the Bunter Sandstone of the UK southern North Sea. Energy Proc. 114, 4564–4570 (2017).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Mackay, E. J. in Geological Storage of Carbon Dioxide (CO2)—Geoscience, Technologies, Environmental Aspects and Legal Frameworks (eds Gluyas, J. & Mathias, S.) 45–70 (Woodhead Publishing, 2013).
Goater, A. L., Bijeljic, B. & Blunt, M. J. Dipping open aquifers—the effect of top-surface topography and heterogeneity on CO2 storage efficiency. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 17, 318–331 (2013).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Thibeau, S. et al. Using pressure and volumetric approaches to estimate CO2 storage capacity in deep saline aquifers. In Proc 12th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (eds Dixon, T. et al.) Vol. 63, 5294–5304 (Elsevier Science, 2014).
CO2Storage Efficiency in Deep Saline Formations—Stage 2 (IEAGHG, 2018).
Szulczewski, M. L., MacMinn, C. W., Herzog, H. J. & Juanes, R. Lifetime of carbon capture and storage as a climate-change mitigation technology. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 5185–5189 (2012).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Ringrose, P. S. et al. The In Salah CO2 storage project: lessons learned and knowledge transfer. In Proc. 11th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (eds Dixon, T. & Yamaji, K.) Vol. 37, 6226–6236 (Elsevier Science, 2013).
Hansen, O. et al. Snohvit: the history of injecting and storing 1 Mt CO2 in the fluvial Tubaen Fm. In Proc. 11th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, GHGT-11 (eds Dixon, T. & Yamaji, K.) Vol. 37, 3565–3573 (Elsevier Science, 2013).
Garnett, A. Literature Review on Capacity Methods, Storage Efficiency, Factors Affecting Injection Rate Decline and Underlying Mathematics—The University of Queensland Surat Deep Aquifer Appriasal Project—Supplementary Detailed Report (Univ. Queensland, 2019).
Birkholzer, J. T., Oldenburg, C. M. & Zhou, Q. CO2 migration and pressure evolution in deep saline aquifers. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 40, 203–220 (2015).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Szulczewski, M. L., MacMinn, C. W. & Juanes, R. Theoretical analysis of how pressure buildup and CO2 migration can both constrain storage capacity in deep saline aquifers. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 23, 113–118 (2014).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Harding, F. C., James, A. T. & Robertson, H. E. The engineering challenges of CO2 storage. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. A 232, 17–26 (2018).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Ringrose, P. S. & Meckel, T. A. Maturing global CO2 storage resources on offshore continental margins to achieve 2DS emissions reductions. Sci. Rep. 9, 17944 (2019).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Bosshart, N. W. et al. Quantifying the effects of depositional environment on deep saline formation CO2 storage efficiency and rate. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 69, 8–19 (2018).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Tian, L., Yang, Z., Fagerlund, F. & Niemi, A. Effects of permeability heterogeneity on CO2 injectivity and storage efficiency coefficient. Greenh. Gases 6, 112–124 (2016).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Hortle, A., Michael, K. & Azizi, E. Assessment of CO2 storage capacity and injectivity in saline aquifers—comparison of results from numerical flow simulations, analytical and generic models. In Proc. 12th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (eds Dixon, T. et al.) Vol. 63, 3544–3562 (Elsevier Science, 2014).
La Croix, A. D. et al. Reservoir modelling notional CO2 injection into the Precipice Sandstone and Evergreen Formation in the Surat Basin, Australia. Petrol. Geosci. 26, 127–140 (2020).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Allen, R., Nilsen, H. M., Lie, K.-A., Moyner, O. & Andersen, O. Using simplified methods to explore the impact of parameter uncertainty on CO2 storage estimates with application to the Norwegian Continental Shelf. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 75, 198–213 (2018).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Bui, M. et al. Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 1062–1176 (2018).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Laherrere, J. Distribution and Evolution of ‘Recovery Factor’ (International Energy Agency, 1997).
Hook, M., Davidsson, S., Johansson, S. & Tang, X. Decline and depletion rates of oil production: a comprehensive investigation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 372, 20120448 (2014).
Article Google Scholar
Sorrell, S., Speirs, J., Bentley, R., Miller, R. & Thompson, E. Shaping the global oil peak: a review of the evidence on field sizes, reserve growth, decline rates and depletion rates. Energy 37, 709–724 (2012).
Article Google Scholar
Braunreiter, L. & Bennett, S. J. The neglected importance of corporate perceptions and positions for the long-term development of CCS. In Proc. 13th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (eds Dixon, T. et al.) Vol. 114, 7197–7204 (Elsevier Science, 2017).
Berly, T. & Garnett, A. Scaling up CO2 transport and storage infrastructure. In Proc. 14th Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Conference (IEAGHG, 2018); https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3366352
D01: UK CO2Storage Site Screening and Selection Methodology (PBD and AWT, 2015); https://www.eti.co.uk/programmes/carbon-capture-storage/strategic-uk-ccs-storage-appraisal
de Coninck, H. & Benson, S. M. Carbon dioxide capture and storage: issues and prospects. Ann. Rev. Environ. Resour. 39, 243–270 (2014).
Herzog, H. Lessons Learned from CCS Demonstration and Large Pilot Projects (MIT, 2016); https://sequestration.mit.edu/bibliography/CCS%20Demos.pdf
Rassool, D., Consoli, C., Townsend, A. & Liu, H. Overview of Organisations and Policies Supporting the Deployment of Large-Scale CCS Facilities (GCCSI, 2020); https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Overview-of-Organisations-and-Policies-Supporting-the-Deployement-of-Large-Scale-CCS-Facilities-2.pdf
Dooley, J. J. & Calvin, K. V. Temporal and spatial deployment of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies across the representative concentration pathways. In Proc. 10th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (eds Gale, J. et al.) Vol. 4, 5845–5852 (Elsevier Science, 2011).
Selosse, S. & Ricci, O. Carbon capture and storage: lessons from a storage potential and localization analysis. Appl. Energy 188, 32–44 (2017).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Bataille, C. G. F. Physical and policy pathways to net-zero emissions industry. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 11, e633 (2020).
Article Google Scholar
Transforming Industry Through CCUS (IEA, 2019).
Ready for Retrofit—The Potential for Equipping China’s Existing Coal Fleet with Carbon Capture and Storage (IEA, 2016).
Cui, R. Y. et al. Quantifying operational lifetimes for coal power plants under the Paris goals. Nat. Commun. 10, 4759 (2019).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Global Material Resources Outlook to 2060: Economic Drivers and Environmental Consequences (OECD, 2019); https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264307452-en
CCS 2014—What Lies in Store for CCS? (IEA, 2014).
Havercroft, I. & Consoli, C. The Carbon Capture and Storage Readiness Index 2018—Is the World Ready for Carbon Capture and Storage? (GCCSI, 2018); https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/resources/publications-reports-research/the-carbon-capture-and-storage-readiness-index-2018-is-the-world-ready-for-carbon-capture-and-storage/
Meeting the Dual Challenge—A Roadmap to At-Scale Deployment of Carbon Capture, Use and Storage (NPC, 2019); https://dualchallenge.npc.org/
The Global Status of CCS 2019 (GCCSI, 2019).
Global Storage Resource Assessment—2019 Update (PBD, 2020).
Sun, L., Dou, H., Li, Z., Hu, Y. & Hao, X. Assessment of CO2 storage potential and carbon capture, utilization and storage prospect in China. J. Energy Inst. 91, 970–977 (2018).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Jiang, K. et al. China’s carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) policy: a critical review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109601 (2019).
India 2020 Energy Policy Review (IEA, 2020).
Roman, M. Carbon capture and storage in developing countries: a comparison of Brazil, South Africa and India. Glob. Environ. Change 21, 391–401 (2011).
Article Google Scholar
Larkin, P. et al. Uncertainty in risk issues for carbon capture and geological storage: findings from a structured expert elicitation. Int. J. Risk Assess. Manage. 22, 429–463 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
Verdon, J. P. & Stork, A. L. Carbon capture and storage, geomechanics and induced seismic activity. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 8, 928–935 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
Celia, M. A., Bachu, S., Nordbotten, J. M. & Bandilla, K. W. Status of CO2 storage in deep saline aquifers with emphasis on modeling approaches and practical simulations. Water Resour. Res. 51, 6846–6892 (2015).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Pawar, R. J. et al. Recent advances in risk assessment and risk management of geologic CO2 storage. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 40, 292–311 (2015).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Meadowcroft, J. & Langhelle, O. in Caching the Carbon: The Politics and Policy of Carbon Capture and Storage (eds Meadowcroft, J. & Langhelle, O.) 267–296 (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2009).
Vilarrasa, V., Carrera, J., Olivella, S., Rutqvist, J. & Laloui, L. Induced seismicity in geologic carbon storage. Solid Earth 10, 871–892 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
Alcalde, J. et al. Estimating geological CO2 storage security to deliver on climate mitigation. Nat. Commun. 9, 2201 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Celia, M. A. Geological storage of captured carbon dioxide as a large-scale carbon mitigation option. Water Resour. Res. 53, 3527–3533 (2017).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, L., Xenias, D. & Jones, C. R. Framing effects on public support for carbon capture and storage. Palgr. Commun. 5, 17 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
Tcvetkov, P., Cherepovitsyn, A. & Fedoseev, S. Public perception of carbon capture and storage: a state-of-the-art overview. Heliyon 5, e02845 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
Seigo, S. L., Dohle, S. & Siegrist, M. Public perception of carbon capture and storage (CCS): a review. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 38, 848–863 (2014).
Article Google Scholar
Larkin, P., Bird, S. & Gattinger, M. Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage—Polarization, Public Confidence and Decision-Making (Univ. Ottawa, 2021).
The Potential for Reducing the Costs of CCS in the UK (DECC, 2013); https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ccs-cost-reduction-task-force-final-report
Rubin, E. S., Mantripragada, H., Marks, A., Versteeg, P. & Kitchin, J. The outlook for improved carbon capture technology. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 38, 630–671 (2012).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Rubin, E. S. Improving cost estimates for advanced low-carbon power plants. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 88, 1–9 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
Glynn, J. et al. CCS in Energy and Climate Scenarios Report Number 2019/05 (IEAGHG, 2019).
Heuberger, C. F., Staffell, I., Shah, N. & Mac Dowell, N. Quantifying the value of CCS for the future electricity system. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 2497–2510 (2016).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Daggash, H. A., Heuberger, C. F. & Mac Dowell, N. The role and value of negative emissions technologies in decarbonising the UK energy system. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 81, 181–198 (2019).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Zapantis, A., Townsend, A. & Rassool, D. Policy Priorities to Incentivise Large Scale Deployment of CCS (GCCSI, 2019); https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/TL-Report-Policy-prorities-to-incentivise-the-large-scale-deployment-of-CCS-digitalfinal.pdf
Havercroft, I. Lessons and Perceptions: Adopting a Commercial Approach to CCS Liability (GCCSI, 2019).
Weber, V. Uncertain liability and stagnating CCS deployment in the European Union: is it the Member States’ turn? Rev. Eur. Comp. Int. Environ. Law 27, 153–161 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
Enabling the Deployment of Industrial CCS Clusters (IEAGHG, 2018).
Fast Track CO2Transport and Storage for Europe (ZEP, 2017).
Greig, C., Baird, J. & Zervos, T. Financial Incentives for the Acceleration of CCS Projects (Univ. Queensland, 2016).
Middleton, R. S. & Yaw, S. The cost of getting CCS wrong: uncertainty, infrastructure design, and stranded CO2. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 70, 1–11 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
Middleton, R. S., Keating, G. N., Viswanathan, H. S., Stauffer, P. H. & Pawar, R. J. Effects of geologic reservoir uncertainty on CO2 transport and storage infrastructure. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 8, 132–142 (2012).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Lohwasser, R. & Madlener, R. Relating R&D and investment policies to CCS market diffusion through two-factor learning. Energy Policy 52, 439–452 (2013).
Article Google Scholar
Godec, M. & Williamson, B. Potential for CO2 storage cost reductions with greater commercial deployment. In Proc. 14th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (IEAGHG, 2018).
Greig, C., Garnett, A., Oesch, J. & Smart, S. Guidelines for Scoping & Estimating Early Mover CCS Projects (Univ. Queensland, 2014); http://anlecrd.com.au/projects/guidelines-for-scoping-estimating-early-mover-ccs-projects/
Flyvbjerg, B. (ed.) in The Oxford Handbook of Megaproject Management Introduction (Oxford Univ. Press, 2017); https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198732242.013.1
Fouquet, R. Path dependence in energy systems and economic development. Nat. Energy 1, 16098 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
Merrow, E. W. Industrial Megaprojects: Concepts, Strategies, and Practices for Success (John Wiley & Sons, 2011).
Songhurst, B. LNG Plant Cost Escalation (Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 2014); https://doi.org/10.26889/9781907555947
Rubin, E. S., Davison, J. E. & Herzog, H. J. The cost of CO2 capture and storage. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 40, 378–400 (2015).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Budinis, S., Krevor, S., Mac Dowell, N., Brandon, N. & Hawkes, A. An assessment of CCS costs, barriers and potential. Energy Strategy Rev. 22, 61–81 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
Xenias, D. & Whitmarsh, L. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) experts’ attitudes to and experience with public engagement. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 78, 103–116 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
Fridahl, M. & Lehtveer, M. Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS): global potential, investment preferences, and deployment barriers. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 42, 155–165 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
Rickels, W., Merk, C., Reith, F., Keller, D. P. & Oschlies, A. Misconceptions about modeling of negative emissions technologies. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 104004 (2019).
Stavrakas, V., Spyridaki, N.-A. & Flamos, A. Striving towards the deployment of bio-energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS): a review of research priorities and assessment needs. Sustainability 10, 2206 (2018).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Markusson, N. et al. A socio-technical framework for assessing the viability of carbon capture and storage technology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 79, 903–918 (2012).
Article Google Scholar
Prospective Evaluation of Applied Energy Research and Development at DOE (Phase Two) (NRC, 2007); https://doi.org/10.17226/11806
Larson, E. et al. Net-Zero America by 2050: Potential Pathways, Deployments and Impacts (Princeton Univ., 2020).
Shackley, S. & Markusson, N. in The Social Dynamics of Carbon Capture and Storage (eds Markusson, N. et al.) 57–68 (Routledge, 2012); https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203118726-13
Hansson, A. & Bryngelsson, M. Expert opinions on carbon dioxide capture and storage—a framing of uncertainties and possibilities. Energy Policy 37, 2273–2282 (2009).
Article Google Scholar
Arranz, A. M. Carbon capture and storage: frames and blind spots. Energy Policy 82, 249–259 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Page, B. Beyond HELE: why CCS is imperative now. Cornerstone 4, 10–12 (2016).
Google Scholar
Buhr, K. & Hansson, A. Capturing the stories of corporations: a comparison of media debates on carbon capture and storage in Norway and Sweden. Glob. Environ. Change 21, 336–345 (2011).
Article Google Scholar
Edwards, G. A. S. Coal and climate change. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 10, e607 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
Pollak, M., Phillips, S. J. & Vajjhala, S. Carbon capture and storage policy in the United States: a new coalition endeavors to change existing policy. Glob. Environ. Change 21, 313–323 (2011).
Article Google Scholar
The Future of Petrochemicals—Towards More Sustainable Plastics and Fertilisers (IEA, 2018); https://www.iea.org/reports/the-future-of-petrochemicals
Technology Roadmap: Low-Carbon Transition in the Cement Industry (IEA and CSI, 2018).
Zhang, C.-Y., Han, R., Yu, B. & Wei, Y.-M. Accounting process-related CO2 emissions from global cement production under Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. J. Clean. Prod. 184, 451–465 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
Janipour, Z., de Nooij, R., Scholten, P., Huijbregts, M. A. J. & de Coninck, H. What are sources of carbon lock-in in energy-intensive industry? A case study into Dutch chemicals production. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 60, 101320 (2020).
Article Google Scholar
Arens, M., Worrell, E., Eichhammer, W., Hasanbeigi, A. & Zhang, Q. Pathways to a low-carbon iron and steel industry in the medium-term—the case of Germany. J. Clean. Prod. 163, 84–98 (2017).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Wesseling, J. H. et al. The transition of energy intensive processing industries towards deep decarbonization: characteristics and implications for future research. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 79, 1303–1313 (2017).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Dewald, U. & Achternbosch, M. Why more sustainable cements failed so far? Disruptive innovations and their barriers in a basic industry. Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans. 19, 15–30 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
Hepburn, C. et al. The technological and economic prospects for CO2 utilization and removal. Nature 575, 87–97 (2019).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. D., Luke, M. & Thernstrom, S. Getting to zero carbon emissions in the electric power sector. Joule 2, 2498–2510 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
Boston, A., Bongers, G., Byrom, S. & Staffell, I. Balancing flexibility whilst decarbonising electricity: the Australian NEM is changing. In Proc. 14th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (IEAGHG, 2019); https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3365626#
Backstrand, K., Meadowcroft, J. & Oppenheimer, M. The politics and policy of carbon capture and storage: framing an emergent technology. Glob. Environ. Change 21, 275–281 (2011).
Article Google Scholar
Vergragt, P. J., Markusson, N. & Karlsson, H. Carbon capture and storage, bio-energy with carbon capture and storage, and the escape from the fossil-fuel lock-in. Glob. Environ. Change 21, 282–292 (2011).
Article Google Scholar
Anderson, K. & Peters, G. The trouble with negative emissions. Science 354, 182–183 (2016).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Riahi, K. et al. The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: an overview. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 153–168 (2017).
Article Google Scholar
Garnett, A., Underschultz, J. & Ashworth, P. Scoping Study for Material Carbon Abatement via Carbon Capture and Storage: Project Report (The University of Queensland Surat Deep Aquifer Appraisal Project (UQ-SDAAP), Univ. Queensland, 2019); https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:734606
Birkholzer, J. & Tsang, C.-F. Introduction to the special issue on site characterization for geological storage of CO2. Environ. Geol. 54, 1579–1581 (2008).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Zhang, K. & Wu, N. Numerical investigation of the storage efficiency factor for CO2 geological sequestration in saline formations. In Proc. 11th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (eds Dixon, T. & Yamaji, K.) Vol. 37, 5267–5274 (Elsevier Science, 2013).
Kolster, C., Masnadi, M. S., Krevor, S., MacDowell, N. & Brandt, A. R. CO2 enhanced oil recovery: a catalyst for gigatonne-scale carbon capture and storage deployment? Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 2594–2608 (2017).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Shi, J.-Q. et al. Snohvit CO2 storage project: assessment of CO2 injection performance through history matching of the injection well pressure over a 32-months period. In Proc. 11th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (eds Dixon, T. & Yamaji, K.) Vol. 37, 3267–3274 (Elsevier Science, 2013).
Milne, P. Gorgon LNG emissions to rise as sand clogs $3.1B CO2 system. Boiling Cold (12 January 2021).
Milne, P. Gorgon emissions to soar until Chevron fixes CO2 injection. Boiling Cold (10 February 2021).
Carpenter, M., Kvien, K. & Aarnes, J. The CO2QUALSTORE guideline for selection, characterisation and qualification of sites and projects for geological storage of CO2. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 5, 942–951 (2011).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Tapia, J. F. D. & Tan, R. R. Fuzzy optimization of multi-period carbon capture and storage systems with parametric uncertainties. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 92, 545–554 (2014).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Liu, G., Gorecki, C. D., Bremer, J. M., Klapperich, R. J. & Braunberger, J. R. Storage capacity enhancement and reservoir management using water extraction: four site case studies. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 35, 82–95 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Flett, M. et al. Subsurface development of CO2 disposal for the Gorgon Project. Energy Proc. 1, 3031–3038 (2009).
CAS Article Google Scholar
Greig, C., Bongers, G., Stott, C. & Byrom, S. Overview of CCS Roadmaps and Projects (Univ. Queensland, 2016); https://co2crc.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/WP3_CCS-Roadmaps-and-Projects.pdf
CCS 2014—What Lies in Store for CCS? 9–32 (OECD/IEA, 2014).
The Costs of CO2Storage (ZEP, 2011).
Carbon Capture and Sequestration Project Database (MIT, 2016); https://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/index.html
Progressing Development of the UK’s Strategic Carbon Dioxide Storage Resource—A Summary of Results from the Strategic UK CO2Storage Appraisal Project (ETI, 2016); https://www.eti.co.uk/programmes/carbon-capture-storage/strategic-uk-ccs-storage-appraisal
Irlam, L. Global Costs of Carbon Capture and Storage—2017 Update (GCCSI, 2017).
The Costs of CO2Capture, Transport and Storage: Post-Demonstration CCS in the EU (ZEP, 2011).
Australian Power Generation Technology Report (CO2CRC, 2015).
Cost of CO2Capture in the Industrial Sector: Cement and Iron and Steel Industries (IEAGHG, 2018).
CCS 2014—What Lies in Store for CCS? 44–51 (OECD/IEA, 2014).
Ketzer, J. M. M., Machado, C. M., Rockett, G. C. & Iglesias, R. S. Brazilian Atlas of CO2Capture and Geological Storage (EDIPUCRS, 2016); https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/resources/publications-reports-research/brazilian-atlas-of-co2-capture-and-geological-storage/
Carbon Storage Atlas 5th edn (DoE, 2015); https://www.netl.doe.gov/coal/carbon-storage/strategic-program-support/natcarb-atlas
CO2Atlas for the Norwegian Continental Shelf. Stavanger, Norway (NPD, 2014); https://www.npd.no/en/facts/publications/co2-atlases/co2-atlas-for-the-norwegian-continental-shelf/
National Carbon Mapping and Infrastructure Plan—Australia: Full Report (DRET, 2009); https://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/parliament/commit.nsf/($lookupRelatedDocsByID)/518FAC2BBA6C246648257C29002DB8E6/$file/NCM_Full_Report.pdf
Kvien, K., Garnett, A., Carpenter, M. E. & Aarnes, J. Application of the CO2QUALSTORE guideline for developing a risk-based investment schedule for an integrated CCS project. In Proc. 10th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (eds Gale, J. et al.) Vol. 4, 5911–5916 (Elsevier Science, 2011).